![]() ![]() Trzepacz PT, Hochstetler H, Wang S et al (2015) Relationship between the Montreal cognitive assessment and mini-mental state examination for assessment of mild cognitive impairment in older adults. Lakens D (2017) Equivalence tests: a practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Livingston SA (1993) Small-sample equating with log-linear smoothing. Kolen MJ, Brennan RL (2013) Test equating: methods and practices. doi: 10.1007/s40523-7Īlbano AD (2016) equate: An R package for observed-score linking and equating. Aging Clin Exp Res 32:699–702Īiello EN, Gramegna C, Esposito A et al (2021) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): updated norms and psychometric insights into adaptive testing from healthy individuals in Northern Italy. Neurol Sci 43:1–25Ĭarpinelli-Mazzi M, Iavarone A, Russo G et al (2020) Mini-mental state examination: new normative values on subjects in Southern Italy. Int Psychogeriatr 24:1749–1755Īiello EN, Rimoldi S, Bolognini N et al (2021) Psychometrics and diagnostics of Italian cognitive screening tests: a systematic review. ![]() Alzheimers Dement 9:529–537ĭong Y, Lee WY, Basri NA et al (2012) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination in detecting patients at higher risk of dementia. Roalf DR, Moberg PJ, Xie SX et al (2013) Comparative accuracies of two common screening instruments for classification of Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy aging. Alzheimer’s Dement Diagn Assess Dis Monit 1:125 Dement Neurocognit Disord 20:41įalkowski JA, Hynan LS, Krishnan K et al (2015) Conversion of MoCA to MMSE scores. Kang SH, Park MH (2021) Validation of four methods for converting scores on the montreal cognitive assessment to scores on the mini-mental state examination-2. Siqueira GS, Hagemann PDM, Coelho DDS et al (2019) Can MoCA and MMSE be interchangeable cognitive screening tools? A systematic review. Tsoi KK, Chan JY, Hirai HW et al (2015) Cognitive tests to detect dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The present data will help avoid inter-rater heterogeneity in cross-sectionally and longitudinally adopting either one of the two cognitive screening tests, and to retrospective analyze data collected via either one test or the other. The LSEE yielded impossible/unreliable conversion estimates for floor scores on both tests, whereas conversions for uppermost scores were highly consistent. ResultsĬonversion-derived scores were statistically equivalent to empirical ones for both the MMSE ( p = 0.948) and the MoCA ( p = 0.437). Equivalence between empirical and conversion-derived scores was determined with a two one-sided test (TOST) procedure. ‘MMSE-to-MoCA’ and ‘MoCA-to-MMSE’ conversion tables were derived via log-linear smoothing equi-percentile equating (LSEE). Methodsįour-hundred and seven Italian healthy adults (165 males, 242 females mean age = 60.61 ± 13.74 years, range= 20–93 mean education = 12.2 ± 4.42 years, range= 4–25) were administered the MMSE and the MoCA. This study aimed to provide equating norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) from a sample of healthy Italian adults. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |